The place to ask China-related questions!
Beijing Shanghai Guangzhou Shenzhen Chengdu Xi'an Hangzhou Qingdao Dalian Suzhou Nanjing More Cities>>

Categories

Close
Welcome to eChinacities Answers! Please or register if you wish to join conversations or ask questions relating to life in China. For help, click here.

By continuing you agree to eChinacities's Privacy Policy .

Sign up with Google Sign up with Facebook
Sign up with Email Already have an account? .
Posts: 18296

Emperor

1
0
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

Q: Once, at the outbreak of Cofid in Wahun, we had a discussion ...

Watch: Communist Professor Declares That US Was Defeated In "Biological War" With Chinateaser image

CCP affiliated researcher says China "put the U.S. back in its place"...

     

 

3 weeks 2 days ago in  Arts & Entertainment - China

 
Highest Voted
Posts: 18296

Emperor

1
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

In depth research on origins of Covid pandemic ... Fauci and all ...

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/lab-leak-theory-investigating-faucis-...

 

Excerpt:

 

State Department official Thomas DiNanno wrote a memo charging that staff from his bureau were “warned…not to pursue an investigation into the origin of COVID-19” because it would “‘open a can of worms’ if it continued.”SOURCE: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

“It was pure panic,” said former deputy national security adviser Matthew Pottinger. “They were getting flooded with queries. Someone made the unfortunate decision to say, ‘We basically know nothing, so let’s put out the statement.’”

 broken heart Then, the bomb-thrower-in-chief   weighed in.

 

At a press briefing just hours later, Trump contradicted his own intelligence officials and claimed that he had seen classified information indicating that the virus had come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Asked what the evidence was, he said, “I can’t tell you that. I’m not allowed to tell you that.”

Trump’s premature statement poisoned the waters for anyone seeking an honest answer to the question of where COVID-19 came from. According to Pottinger, there was an “antibody response” within the government, in which any discussion of a possible lab origin was linked to destructive nativist posturing.

 

Report Abuse
1 week 1 day ago
 
Answers (6)
Comments (4)
0
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

Cheap suits, antique glasses and paperback bootleg copies of books in background. If you run the world, you can afford a better prop for a video.

Report Abuse
3 weeks 2 days ago
 
Posts: 18296

Emperor

0
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

Fauci Finally Admits COVID-19 May Have Come From Wuhan Lab, 'Not Convinced' Of Natural Originteaser image

What a difference Rand Paul makes...

 

Report Abuse
2 weeks 5 days ago
 
Posts: 18296

Emperor

1
0
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

WHO ... do you think you are? 

 

UK Government Says WHO Needs To "Explore All Possible Theories" On COVID Originsteaser image

...must be “robust, transparent, and independent,” and needs to “explore all possible theories,”

 

icnif77:

Fun House ...

 

Watch: Tucker Carlson Blasts Fauci, WHO, Media For Lying About COVID Lab Leak For A Year

teaser image

“Pretty much every sane person acknowledges at this point that the government of China likely caused the single worst man-made disaster in human history.” 

 

2 weeks 3 days ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
2 weeks 3 days ago
 
Posts: 18296

Emperor

0
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

US Sitting On 'Raft' Of Unexamined Virus Intel; Former Official Says 'Almost No Evidence' Of Natural Originteaser image

"To say this came out of a zoonotic situation, it's ridiculous"

 

 

Excerpt:

In other words, the US government has been sitting on a large collection of intelligence in perhaps the most important investigation into an economy-wrecking global pandemic, as China destroyed evidence and has refused to cooperate with international probes. According to the report, Biden's call for the new investigation was in response to the 'new' evidence.

While officials declined to describe the new evidence, they are hoping to apply 'an extraordinary amount of computer power' to analyze what the Times speculates may be 'databases of Chinese communications, the movement of lab workers and the pattern of the outbreak of the disease around the city of Wuhan."

Biden's call was also meant to spur American allies and intelligence agencies to scour their own evidence, such as "intercepts, witnesses or biological evidence — as well as hunt for new intelligence," to assess whether the Chinese government covered up what happened.

According to the report, US allies have been providing evidence since the beginning of the pandemic. Australia, a member of the so-called Five Eyes partnership which also includes Britain, Canada and New Zealand, has strongly promoted the lab-leak theory. And while US intelligence agencies are reportedly coming together "around the two likely scenarios," a former State Department official says the evidence to support the natural origin theory is virtually non-existent.

"We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Fauci's NIAID organization, there was almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19," said former State Department official David Asher in a statement to Fox News. "The data disproportionately stacked up as we investigated that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural source."

Asher, the lead contractor on the subject, said the team investigated the two chief hypotheses for the virus' origins, the other being the lab-leak theory that has gained credence after widespread media dismissal over the past year.

Asher has a history of investigative work tracking money for the AQ Khan network, North Korea's nuclear program, and top Al Qaeda leaders, but has fallen under scrutiny from former State Department officials.

Asher was critical Thursday of former Assistant Secretary of State Chris Ford, who expressed reservations about the investigation's findings and cautioned against the lab theory. Ford told Fox News that the AVC probe had been kept secret from him and bypassed department and intelligence community biological experts, although adding the lab origin theory was "very possible." -Fox News

"That was the epicenter of synthetic biology in the People's Republic of China, and they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain-of-function techniques," said Asher, adding that the odds of natural origin were 'extremely long.'

 

"To say this came out of a zoonotic situation, it's ridiculous," he concluded.

... more ...

Report Abuse
2 weeks 1 day ago
 
Posts: 18296

Emperor

0
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

I have a new one ... butT ... did you know, you don't score any pints when posting at yer own thread? surprise

 

I want to say, consider that posting as FREE ... 

 

No Longer A “Conspiracy Theory” - Our Revelation 16 Months Ago Now Widely AcceptedBY DOHMEN CAPITAL RESEARCH

What our Jan 2020 research revealed about the origin of COVID-19 is no longer considered a "Conspiracy Theory" 

 

On December 30th, 2019, a 34-year old doctor in China, Li Wenliang, wrote his colleagues on the website Weibo that he had found a new virus infection that was very contagious. He warned in a chat group with some of his colleagues to wear protective clothing to avoid infection.

He had noticed seven cases of a virus that he thought looked like SARS – the virus that led to a global epidemic in 2003.

Four days later, he was summoned to the Public Security Bureau where he was told to sign a letter. In the letter he was accused of “making false comments” that had “severely disturbed the social order”. Some days later it was reported he died of a virus infection. Many say he was killed by the Chinese police.

Apparently, the Chinese did not want the world to know about this new virus before it had spread and infected the world. China protected its two biggest cities, Beijing and Shanghai, but allowed Chinese citizens to fly out of the country to other countries. What was the goal and motive?

In mid-January 2020, the virus became a major concern in the media. We did research in the foreign press, not U.S. sources, and we found some revealing news. The official story circulating within the U.S. was that the virus came from the live food market in Wuhan. That was a diversion to distract from the real source.

 

The Latest:

Everywhere someone in government is urging us to get “the vaccine.” When someone is so pushy to give us something “for our health and safety” for “free,” we get suspicious. The mRNA technology used for the most popular COVID drugs was never actually approved to be widely used in vaccines. Therefore, long-term effects are not known.

By definition, it is NOT a vaccine, but a gene therapy. It does not cause the typical antibody reaction of a vaccine in the body.

The widely used therapies for COVID, Hydroxychloroquine with zinc, or Ivermectin, are inexpensive but very effective when taken early. These were suddenly “unapproved” by the FDA when the vaccine companies entered the picture. These vaccines have cost the taxpayer over $10 billion.

Hydroxychloroquine costs around $8 for a prescription. There are no side effects in over 60 years of use. Is it possible that this therapy was removed to make room for something billions of times more expensive?

 

Conclusion:

Our insights enabled us to give a crash warning for the markets, which occurred just four weeks later. That Wellington Letter issue alone was worth a fortune for big investors because the vast majority of investors were bullish at the time.

Now we also know that the Wuhan Biolab work on the virus was paid for by the U.S. NIH subsidiary, headed by Fauci. One report says $3.75 million was sent to Wuhan. Another stated that number was $81 million.

You can speculate the rest, which enabled us to figure out what would be the agenda for the election and the future for the U.S. We wrote in late 2019 that a market crash would be engineered ahead of the election. As we saw, it was!

Report Abuse
2 weeks 21 hours ago
 
Posts: 18296

Emperor

1
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

In depth research on origins of Covid pandemic ... Fauci and all ...

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/lab-leak-theory-investigating-faucis-...

 

Excerpt:

 

State Department official Thomas DiNanno wrote a memo charging that staff from his bureau were “warned…not to pursue an investigation into the origin of COVID-19” because it would “‘open a can of worms’ if it continued.”SOURCE: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

“It was pure panic,” said former deputy national security adviser Matthew Pottinger. “They were getting flooded with queries. Someone made the unfortunate decision to say, ‘We basically know nothing, so let’s put out the statement.’”

 broken heart Then, the bomb-thrower-in-chief   weighed in.

 

At a press briefing just hours later, Trump contradicted his own intelligence officials and claimed that he had seen classified information indicating that the virus had come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Asked what the evidence was, he said, “I can’t tell you that. I’m not allowed to tell you that.”

Trump’s premature statement poisoned the waters for anyone seeking an honest answer to the question of where COVID-19 came from. According to Pottinger, there was an “antibody response” within the government, in which any discussion of a possible lab origin was linked to destructive nativist posturing.

 

Report Abuse
1 week 1 day ago
 
Know the answer ?
Please or register to post answer.

Report Abuse

Security Code: * Enter the text diplayed in the box below
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <u>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.

More information about formatting options

Forward Question

Answer of the DayMORE >>
A: Most of the companies still use traditional methods of hiring such as,
A:Most of the companies still use traditional methods of hiring such as, interviews, resume reviews, background screening, etc. HR professionals still follow the several, decades old pattern of personality assessments but in a quicker and efficient way, which will yield accurate results. Employee assessments tools are extremely beneficial in realizing the results are quantifiable and go a long way in ascertaining the work style and behavioral attributes of potential employees before they set foot into your company. In-fact they take out the guesswork involved in recruiting the employees who can work together.  The major benefit of the assessment tools is not confined to the hiring process, but also used as an effective tool of employee retention. The assessment tool will identify the gap between employee work style and job needs. They provide you a road map for recruitment of prospective employees and the further development of essential traits such as, leadership ability, individual development, team communications and conflict resolution. It will also help the employees to make better, satisfying and successful career choices. Nowadays more and more organizations are integrating personality assessments with skill tests, leadership evaluations, 360-degree assessment, evaluation and feedback, disc personality profile and behavioral assessment. -- LoganMountgarre