The place to ask China-related questions!
Beijing Shanghai Guangzhou Shenzhen Chengdu Xi'an Hangzhou Qingdao Dalian Suzhou Nanjing More Cities>>

Categories

Close
Welcome to eChinacities Answers! Please or register if you wish to join conversations or ask questions relating to life in China. For help, click here.
Posts: 212

Governor

0
0
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

Q: Where do the rich Chinese source organs from now?

Scientists harvested organs from Chinese prisoners without consent

A group of researchers is calling for the retraction of more than 400 scientific papers after a first-of-its-kind study that claims countless human organs were unethically harvested from prisoners in China.

The study, which was published in the journal BMJ Open and led by Australian researchers, highlights a facet of scientific ethics that does not receive a lot of attention. Namely, that many English-language academic journals do not follow international ethics rules over donor consent for organ transplants.

“There’s no real pressure from research leaders on China to be more transparent,” Wendy Rogers, a professor of clinical ethics at Macquarie University and the study’s author, told the Guardian.

“Everyone seems to say, ‘It’s not our job.’ The world’s silence on this barbaric issue must stop.”

According to the British publication, this is the first time that any study has examined the progress of the transplant community in preventing unethical research.

The study looked at research papers published from January 2000 until April 2017. Researchers identified 445 studies involving 85,477 transplants. A staggering 92.5 percent failed to report whether or not organs were sourced from executed prisoners, while 99 percent failed to report that organ sources gave consent for transplantation.

The Australian researchers also found that two organizations that have barred research involving executed prisoners, the Journal of American Transplantation and The Transplantation Society, have also made questionable decisions about publishing papers.

“A large body of unethical research now exists, raising issues of complicity and moral hazard to the extent that the transplant community uses and benefits from the results of this research,” the researchers write in the study’s conclusion.

“We call for a retraction of this literature pending investigation of the individual papers.”

 

 

1 week 6 days ago in  Health & Safety - China

 
Highest Voted
Posts: 3817

Emperor

1
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

Obviously I don't know anything at all about the subject but my guess would be that if you have the money to spend there is a huge blackmarket for organs.

 

Prisoners, deaths in hospitals etc... where there's money to be made there will be people cashing in on it regardless of any laws that may exist.

 

It's probably harder for the average foreigner to arrange a transplant in China now but I bet if you're a connected local it would be doable.

Report Abuse
1 week 5 days ago
 
Answers (1)
Comments (0)
Posts: 3817

Emperor

1
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

Obviously I don't know anything at all about the subject but my guess would be that if you have the money to spend there is a huge blackmarket for organs.

 

Prisoners, deaths in hospitals etc... where there's money to be made there will be people cashing in on it regardless of any laws that may exist.

 

It's probably harder for the average foreigner to arrange a transplant in China now but I bet if you're a connected local it would be doable.

Report Abuse
1 week 5 days ago
 
Know the answer ?
Please or register to post answer.

Report Abuse

Security Code: * Enter the text diplayed in the box below
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <u>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.

More information about formatting options

Forward Question

Answer of the DayMORE >>
A: Wow, you really found that nitpicky talking point that elevates the fo
A:Wow, you really found that nitpicky talking point that elevates the fossil fuel industry to the same level as the interests of humanity. Isn't it all just a "liberal" scam, if you don't look too closely at the absence of logic? "Yes, it must be. My masters are hinting that that's what I should believe!"

You've made it clear you are consciously ignoring the pollution and global warming. Since your handlers, the conservative establishment whose dismantling of the carbon credit system and environmental destruction you choose to ignore, have made it clear you should bark in this direction, you are eager to please!

Such an admirably domesticated, dependable, subservient human. I'm sure your handlers will throw you a bone while they bring home the bacon for themselves. You're so obedient, you deserve a doggie cookie! Who's a good boy? You are! Yes, you are. U-S-A! Woof woof woof! -- coineineagh