The place to ask China-related questions!
Beijing Shanghai Guangzhou Shenzhen Chengdu Xi'an Hangzhou Qingdao Dalian Suzhou Nanjing More Cities>>


Welcome to eChinacities Answers! Please or register if you wish to join conversations or ask questions relating to life in China. For help, click here.

Verify email

Your verification code has been sent to:

Didn`t receive your code? Resend code

By continuing you agree to eChinacities's Privacy Policy .

Sign up with Google Sign up with Facebook
Sign up with Email Already have an account? .
Posts: 7451


You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!

Q: Alert or Alarmed ?

The South Pacific has become an increasingly important geopolitical chessboard with the United States, China and Australia racing to secure ports, cyber infrastructure and potential military bases in a number of small but strategic island nations.

Over the past 12 months, the governments of Vanuatu, Fiji, Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands have all been wooed and seduced by Canberra, Washington and Beijing to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Adam Ni, a policy researcher at Australian National University's Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, said it is inevitable that these Pacific nations, whose allegiance has long been taken for granted, will be sucked into China's mighty orbit from out of Australia's backyard.

A US warship makes its way up Sydney Harbour June 20, 2003 in Sydney, Australia. Five US warships arrived in Sydney for a weekend stay after serving in the Persian Gulf. (Getty)

Mr Ni predicts Australia's international diplomacy will be strained and put to the test in this new era of South Pacific posturing, as Canberra attempts to delicately balance vital strategic, military and trade ties to superpowers, the US and China.

"As China expands outward, with a military presence and economically, the Pacific will acquire a never-before seen importance," Mr Ni told

"If you look at Chinese investment ... you see a trend where China is increasingly becoming more influential in the Pacific."

Mr Ni said China's economic footholds in the Pacific and investment in massive infrastructure projects, such as ports, can over time evolve into a military outpost.

RELATED ARTICLESDolce & Gabbana issue Chinese video apologySeven killed in intense hour-long shootout at Chinese Consulate in PakistanFive dead and 18 hurt after driver swerves into crowd of schoolchildren in northeastern China

This year China opened its first foreign military base in Djibouti, the small African country situated on the Horn of Africa.

The military base grew out of a joint Djibouti-China commercial port, launched only two months earlier.

Ships carrying Chinese military personnel depart at a port on July 11, 2017 in Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province of China. China will set up a support base in Djibouti. The establishment of the People's Liberation Army Djibouti base was a decision made by China and Djibouti after friendly negotiations. (Getty)

A large Sri Lankan port, big enough to hold huge warships, has also come under Chinese control. Both Djibouti and Sri Lanka had fallen into heavy financial debt to China. Earlier this year China denied it was seeking to establish a military base in Vanuatu.


Global maritime dominance is vital for China. Djibouti sits right on a crucial shipping lane choke point, the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Sri Lanka's giant Hambantota port, now operated by China on a 99-year lease, offers strategic access to India, the Middle East, Africa, Asia and Australia's west and northern coast. The US is known to be rattled by such developments.

China's growing influence in the South Pacific. (

Ahead of last week's APEC conference in Papua New Guinea, Zheng Zeguang, vice-minister of the Chinese foreign ministry, made Beijing's position and outlook in the South Pacific clear.

"The cooperation and aids we provide in the island nations are not targeting any third parties," Mr Zheng told reporters, before issuing a further proclamation.

"Any country should not stop China's friendly cooperation and communication with island nations – and of course they could not stop such cooperation and communication."

Near the conclusion of the APEC conference, Australia announced it, along with the US, will develop a naval base in Papua New Guinea.

An F/A-18F Super Hornet from the Black Aces of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 41 launches off the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis. (Getty)

The PNG naval base is just the latest sign of great power competition in the South Pacific. A number of significant moves have already been played this year, and the Pacific islands, now squarely in the middle of this tug of war, have reaped the benefits.

In June, the Australian government confirmed it would spend $200m to fund submarine cables and a cyber security centre for the Solomon Islands, trumping Chinese ambitions. Some analysts believed the scuppered bid from Chinese telecom giant Huawei, which would have connected the Solomons and PNG to Sydney with an undersea cable, could have threatened Australia's cyber security.

Similarly, in April Fairfax reported high-level discussions had taken place between Washington and Canberra over reports, denied by Beijing, that China was seeking to build a military base in Vanuatu, located less than 2000km from Australia.

Two J-15 fighter jets of the PLA (People's Liberation Army) Navy prepare to take off from China's aircraft carrier, The Liaoning, followed by destroyers and frigates during a naval exercise in the western Pacific (AAP)

At the time, then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Australia "would view with great concern the establishment of any foreign military bases in those Pacific Island countries and neighbours of ours."

Vanuatu's links with China have strengthened in recent years, with the small island nation receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in Chinese development money.

Vanuatu is known to have backed China's position on the disputed South China Sea. The US has raised concerns over what it claims are loans issued by China which come with strings attached, and can end with that nation beholden to Chinese ambitions.

Several months after the Vanuatu issue had spiked Turnbull's pulse rate, Fiji was suddenly thrust onto the radar. Australia and China faced off with competing bids to develop a Fijian military base in Nadi called Black Rock.

The Black Rock base will act as a regional hub for Fiji's police and peacekeeping training and pre-deployment preparation.

Keen to show their commitment, in the lead up to the Fijian government selecting a winning bid, Australia gave the Fiji navy a patrol boat. Similarly, China gifted the Fijian navy a surveillance and hydrographic vessel.

Graphic showing China's Belt Road Initiative (BRI) - also known as One Belt, One Road. (Getty)

It appears, at least for the immediate future, Pacific nations can expect government officials to arrive bearing gifts. This year China announced it will be donate a frigate warship to Sri Lanka and four patrol boats to the Philippines navy.

In one of Malcolm Turnbull's final acts as prime minister, he announced Australia would be fully funding the development of Black Rock. A year earlier, Australia had pledged $2m to the base. During a media briefing in October, Australia's Department of Defence would not comment on what defence assets or troops might be deployed to Nadi.

Mr Ni said it is obvious that Australia cannot hope to keep outbidding China in the Pacific.

"Australia's resources are limited, so they have to be very smart as to where they put these resources," he said. "We have to be creative how we engage with these small Pacific countries."

According to him, Canberra will need to embrace a competitive and co-operative approach.

"You can't just have a confrontational approach alone," he said. "That would mean you are viewing the world through zero-sum eyes, and simply trying to do everything to decrease China's power."


Under president Xi Jinping's rule, China has steadily rolled out its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

The BRI, also known as One Belt, One Road, seeks to promote co-operation along five corridors out of China: land routes through Central Asia to Europe; to the Middle East, and Southeast Asia; and sea routes connecting Chinese ports to Europe and to the South Pacific.

Among other strategies, the BRI involves huge investment in infrastructure including ports, rail, bridges, oil and gas pipelines.

China's growing naval power is vital to protecting its trading and BRI ambitions.

"[China] has to guard its investment and expanding footprint," Mr Ni said.

"To project that kind of power, you need a powerful navy. You need an expeditionary force to be able to move troops overseas. Forward bases and foreign ports are vital."

FOLLOW: Mark Saunokonoko on Twitter

© Nine Digital Pty Ltd 2018

5 years 13 weeks ago in  Health & Safety - China

Answers (1)
Comments (3)
Posts: 7201


You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!

China has a single blue water battle group. With maybe a half dozen 4.5 generation jets embarked. Its base on the horn of Africa will support, so far as I know, a littorial coastal fleet to defend against piracy. It will be home to frigattes and coastguard cutters that need to relay their trip there.

A few Chinese frigattes firing water hoses at somalian pirates does not make an invasion force that threatens continental nations.

Get a grip dude Smile


I am sure American Marines are based in OZ. And the US has just secured a new base in Papua NG. No doubt to protect against a Chinese invasion force that was constucted, trained, and travelled thousands of miles across open ocean without being spotted at all. Imagine that headline.. Chinese fleet of 20 thousand ships arrives undetected at Perth. The OZ PM surrenders. He blames gun control laws, and is secretly whisked away to Indonesia on a PT boat, where he pleads for asylum. Ha ha.. love it.

5 years 13 weeks ago
Report Abuse


Chinese run Port of Darwin...go figure that one out

5 years 13 weeks ago
Report Abuse


Ha ha phill... the UK is the same as OZ.. desperate for Chinese money.

5 years 13 weeks ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
5 years 13 weeks ago
Know the answer ?
Please or register to post answer.

Report Abuse

Security Code: * Enter the text diplayed in the box below
Enter the characters shown in the image.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <u>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.

More information about formatting options

Forward Question

Answer of the DayMORE >>
A: In my personal experience, teaching certificates have varied in releva
A:In my personal experience, teaching certificates have varied in relevance depending on the context and location. Here's a breakdown of each aspect:a) Getting the teaching job: Teaching certificates can certainly enhance your chances of securing a teaching position, especially in formal educational settings such as schools and language institutions. Many employers prefer candidates who have undergone specific training in pedagogy and instructional techniques, which these certificates often provide. However, other factors such as experience, references, and the demand for teachers in a particular area also play significant roles in the hiring process.b) Getting a higher salary than your uncertified competitors: In some cases, holding a teaching certificate can indeed lead to a higher salary compared to uncertified competitors. Many educational institutions have structured salary scales that take into account factors such as level of education, years of experience, and additional certifications. Holding a teaching certificate may place you in a higher salary bracket or make you eligible for certain salary incentives or bonuses. However, this can vary widely depending on the specific policies of the institution or organization.c) Getting promotions: Teaching certificates can be beneficial for career advancement and securing promotions within the field of education. They demonstrate a commitment to professional development and mastery of teaching skills, which are qualities that many employers value when considering candidates for leadership positions or administrative roles. Additionally, some promotions may require specific certifications or qualifications, making holding a teaching certificate essential for advancement in certain cases.Regarding which certificate yields better results, it largely depends on the specific requirements of the job market and the educational context in which you intend to work. For example:A Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) is often highly regarded in formal school settings and can be advantageous for those seeking positions in primary or secondary education.Montessori certification is valuable for individuals interested in working in Montessori schools or implementing Montessori principles in their teaching approach.A Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) certificate is particularly relevant for those seeking to teach English to non-native speakers in international contexts or language schools.Ultimately, the best certificate for you will depend on your career goals, the specific requirements of the positions you're interested in, and the preferences of potential employers in your target job market. It's essential to research the requirements and preferences of employers in your desired field and tailor your qualifications accordingly. -- ruqaiya761