The place to ask China-related questions!
Beijing Shanghai Guangzhou Shenzhen Chengdu Xi'an Hangzhou Qingdao Dalian Suzhou Nanjing More Cities>>

Categories

Close
Welcome to eChinacities Answers! Please or register if you wish to join conversations or ask questions relating to life in China. For help, click here.
X

Verify email

Your verification code has been sent to:

Didn`t receive your code? Resend code

By continuing you agree to eChinacities's Privacy Policy .

Sign up with Google Sign up with Facebook
Sign up with Email Already have an account? .
Posts: 7204

Emperor

0
2
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
2

Q: will Hillary soon be wearing Prison Pant suits ?

7.6.5.4.3.2.....We demand a do over lol.
Will Hillary have some explaining to do?
Will the left call do over like they did in the UK because they didn't win ?
only in America lol.
Lets hear your thoughts either way pro or not of Trump .
laughs and tears

7 years 23 weeks ago in  Arts & Entertainment - China

 
Highest Voted
Posts: 4422

Emperor

2
2
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

I think we can put it very simple: Americans saw no change in the last five years, I only saw Obama after mass shooting to make a speech or greet sport players or talk about sport players on ESPN. Some think Hiliary would have kept us on the same path of no change. But I think that whole email thing didn't hurt her, it was the fact that she never talked about her plans too much for the U.S future, only argued with Trump or added word punches.

Will she go to jail? No, Obama would pardon her before he left office.

Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Answers (9)
Comments (13)
Posts: 5732

Emperor

1
0
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

Obama has no choice now, he will have to give her a pardon or the Clinton's will take him down with them. I love a happy ending. This will put a black mark on his legacy like Ford when he pardoned Nixon. I love history repeating itself as well.

philbravery:

Im sure Bill will be up for a happy ending .lol

7 years 23 weeks ago
Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
Report Abuse

ambivalentmace:

Progressive liberal hypocrites are so damn predictable.

7 years 23 weeks ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Posts: 19797

Emperor

0
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

http://openmindmagazine.com/julian-assange-just-wikileaks-dispenses-2300...

 

WikiLeaks 1http://openmindmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WikiLeaks-1-300x1... 300x, http://openmindmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WikiLeaks-1-150x8... 150x" width="737" />News Julian Assange just did it: WikiLeaks Dispenses 23,000 Hillary Emails Marked “C” for Confidential (Classified)   WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told us a month ago that the next batch of leaked Hillary Clinton emails could lead to an indictment.
Now, over 23,000 cables were just put out for the world to see.Busted: 23035 cables sent to Clinton using “(C)” (classified) marking in her 1st year alone https://t.co/U0fOh6Bx42pic.twitter.com/foNXxgLqMJ

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 7, 2016

FBI Director James Comey claimed that Clinton may have not understood what was classified and what wasn’t, but WikiLeaks isn’t buying it.

 

FBI head testified he wasn’t sure that Clinton was familiar with CONFIDENTIAL marks. But she was intimately familar:

More via The Hill:

FBI Director James Comey on Thursday said it was not clear whether Hillary Clinton fully understood the government’s marking system for classified messages.

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) pressed Comey about whether he was testifying that Clinton didn’t know what a classified marking is.

 

“No, not that she would have no idea what a classified marking would be,” Comey responded. “It’s an interesting question whether she … was actually sophisticated enough to understand what a C in [parentheses] means.”

She didn’t get it, you guys.

Cut her a break!

Classic.

That’s who I want running the country – an old woman who doesn’t understand what she’s doing.

Are Democrat voters honestly foolish enough to believe Hillary did nothing wrong? 

 

ambivalentmace:

Imagine all those world leaders that have been paying money to the Clinton Foundation for the future favors of her presidency that got nothing today. She better double up on the secret service protection for a while or at least till she coughs her self to death.

7 years 23 weeks ago
Report Abuse

Shining_brow:

A Secretary of (US) State doesn't fully understand the codes for confidentiality.... WTF??? Sounds like Rice and the others who could never have imagined terrorists attacking buildings with jets... while they were conducting that very exercise.

7 years 22 weeks ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Posts: 5732

Emperor

0
2
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
2

CHEERS From a very happy DEPLORABLE

diverdude1:

You and me both!  That woman had me worried,,, darn, doesn't she read a newspaper??  or is what went down in Paris, Brussels, Cologne, ok with her??  Anyway, Thank God we have a President-elect who understands fundamentals and isn't running around singing kum ba ya.

7 years 23 weeks ago
Report Abuse

philbravery:

maybe the USA will be allowed to win a war now

7 years 22 weeks ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Posts: 7178

Emperor

0
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

I congratulate president elect Trump. He won. I accept democracy.

Shining_brow:

Ummm... you call the US electoral system a 'democracy'??

7 years 22 weeks ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Posts: 2578

Emperor

0
0
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

deplorable me feel somewhat vindicated too ,,,  I am happy that the other half of the basket bailed me and us out.  

Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Posts: 19797

Emperor

0
0
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

http://openmindmagazine.com/flashing-red-light-new-fbi-files-contain-all...

 

flashing-red-lightNews ‘FLASHING RED LIGHT’: New FBI files contain allegations of ‘quid pro quo’ in Clinton’s emails

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a “quid pro quo” between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.
“This is a flashing red light of potential criminality,” Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah, who has been briefed on the FBI interviews, told Fox News.
He said “there was an alleged quid pro quo” involving Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy and the FBI “over at least one classified email.”1476566737266http://openmindmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1476566737266-768... 768x, http://openmindmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1476566737266.jpg 880x" width="300" />
“In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.
As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.
Chaffetz has not read the new documents, which include classified records that must be read in a security facility. But based on a briefing from staffers, Chaffetz said there are grounds for at least “four hearings” after the recess. Chaffetz, who is currently out of town campaigning, said allegations came from witnesses though there is some conflict in the record.
“Both myself and Chairman Devin Nunes of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence are infuriated by what we have heard,” he added.
“Left to their own devices the FBI would never have provided these [records] to Congress and waited until the last minute. This is the third batch because [the FBI] didn’t think they were relevant,” Chaffetz said.
The second congressional source backed the assessment, and both added that they expect the FBI interviews will be released as early as Monday as part of ongoing FOIA requests.
A spokesperson at the FBI provided a lengthy statement to Fox Saturday night — disputing Chaffetz’s characterization and stating that, while the conversation did happen, the two issues discussed were not connected. The FBI’s statement is below:

“Prior to the initiation of the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s personal email server, the FBI was asked to review and make classification determinations on FBI emails and information which were being produced by the State Department pursuant to FOIA. The FBI determined that one such email was classified at the Secret level. A senior State Department official requested the FBI re-review that email to determine whether it was in fact classified or whether it might be protected from release under a different FOIA exemption. A now-retired FBI official, who was not part of the subsequent Clinton investigation, told the State Department official that they would look into the matter. Having been previously unsuccessful in attempts to speak with the senior State official, during the same conversation, the FBI official asked the State Department official if they would address a pending, unaddressed FBI request for space for additional FBI employees assigned abroad. Following the call, the FBI official consulted with a senior FBI executive responsible for determining the classification of the material and determined the email was in fact appropriately classified at the Secret level. The FBI official subsequently told the senior State official that the email was appropriately classified at the Secret level and that the FBI would not change the classification of the email. The classification of the email was not changed, and it remains classified today. Although there was never a quid pro quo, these allegations were nonetheless referred to the appropriate officials for review.”

Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent.
Pamela K. Browne is Senior Executive Producer at the FOX News Channel (FNC) and is Director of Long-Form Series and Specials. Her journalism has been recognized with several awards. Browne first joined FOX in 1997 to launch the news magazine “Fox Files” and later, “War Stories.”

  

 

Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Posts: 4422

Emperor

2
2
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

I think we can put it very simple: Americans saw no change in the last five years, I only saw Obama after mass shooting to make a speech or greet sport players or talk about sport players on ESPN. Some think Hiliary would have kept us on the same path of no change. But I think that whole email thing didn't hurt her, it was the fact that she never talked about her plans too much for the U.S future, only argued with Trump or added word punches.

Will she go to jail? No, Obama would pardon her before he left office.

Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Posts: 5156

Emperor

0
0
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

We're fools to think Trump will worry about Hilary after he's sworn in. Campaign talk is BS. Trump is smarter than all of us, he keeps the attention on him.

Shining_brow:

If Trump is anti-corruption in the government, then he can't ignore Hilary - or anyone else.

 

I strongly suspect that not much will change in regards to the political system in the US. Trump is only the president - he's still got to deal with his congress and senate.

 

However, it will mean, he won't have the same excuse that Obama had - that he was fighting an uphill battle to get bills passed.

7 years 22 weeks ago
Report Abuse

Englteachted:

As I said, no damn reason. You don't fucking kill people for that. You don't risk nuclear war for that.

7 years 22 weeks ago
Report Abuse

Englteachted:

Sorry responding to wrong comment

7 years 22 weeks ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Posts: 19797

Emperor

1
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/fat-lady-sore-throat/

 

The Fat Lady Has a Sore Throat

A mighty nausea wells up across the land as the awful day cometh. Who will receive the black spot of fate on Tuesday? I wouldn’t want to be him or her on that dreadful day. The flagship of Modernity has lost its vaunted mojo and nobody knows what to do about it as the USS-USA pitches and yaws into the maelstrom.

Much opinion “out there” contends that we will have to suffer an election overtime, with the results contested on every hill and molehill from sea to shining sea. That scenario suggests various outcomes, all of them pretty bad: 1) the election is once again relegated to a Supreme Court case, only this time it ends up a 4-4 tie. Constitutional crisis time. 2) Perhaps as a function of No. 1, it ends up in the US House of Representatives. The catch is: members aren’t limited to Trump or HRC. They can vote for whoever they like. 3) A lot of web chatter has President Obama invoking some sort of emergency with the election postponed until some conclave of political viziers can figure a way out of it. Unlikely, but possible.

FBI Director James Comey’s eleventh hour reprieve of Hillary in the email server case sent an odor of rotting carp wafting across the political landscape. Like, his peeps actually vetted 650,000 emails in a week? I’m sure. Of course, the FBI does not issue indictments; that’s AG Loretta Lynch’s job over at the Department of Justice. The FBI only makes criminal referrals to such. But this puts too fine a point on the matter because the much more serious issue is the Clinton Foundation case, and the arrant sale of influence while HRC ran the State Department.

That currently overshadowed case is not closed. It sends up the odor not of a single rotting carp but of an entire whale pod dead on the beach. Half the emirs in Arabia dropped millions on the foundation to facilitate arms deals or to influence policy at State, and that was only part of what looks exactly like a classic racketeering operation. The Clinton Foundation story is not going away anytime soon and it will suck all the air out of the public arena for as far ahead as anyone can see when Hillary is in the oval office.

All of that obscures the gathering calamity in banking and finance that drives the waiting, whirling maelstrom. Thanks to eight years of central bank experiments, the engines of capital are hopelessly gunked up with political additives like QE and ZIRP™. Nothing is priced correctly, especially money. It’s all kept running on an ether of accounting fraud. We can’t come to grips with the resource realities behind the fraud, especially the end of cheap oil. And the bottom line is the already-manifest slowdown of global business. The poobahs of banking pretend to be confounded by all this because everything — their reputations, their jobs, their fortunes — depends on the Potemkin narrative that ever-greater economic expansion lies just around the corner.

Not so. What waits around the corner is a global scramble for the table scraps of the late techno-industrial banquet. Scrambles like that are liable to foment kinetic conflict. Neither Hillary or Trump appear to have a clue what this means and so they are likely to misinterpret the true signals amid all the noise and start an unnecessary war. Hillary is already hard at it with her cawing over supposed “Russian hackers” in the election.

The tragedy of Trump is that he represented a roster of legitimate grievances but argued them so poorly and then betrayed them with behavior so oafish and crude that he often looked not sane enough to hold high office. His partisans brushed that aside, saying it was good enough that he personified a giant “fuck you” to the political establishment. No, that wasn’t good enough because in the process he de-legitimized the issues.

For instance, There are excellent arguments for a “time-out” from immigration. Congress acted on that in 1925, after a half-century flood of immigration needed to man the factories of the early 20thcentury. The consensus on that policy change was arrived at with minimal rancor — and just in time, by the way, for the Great Depression, when manufacturing employment crashed. We’re also in for a collapse of activity, only this time it won’t be the few remaining factory workers. It’ll be everyone from the McDonalds counter jockeys to the bond packagers of Goldman Sachs.

The establishment will get its “fuck you” anyway. I do go along with the argument advanced by others that it would probably be better for Hillary to win, because that way the right people (the gang already in power) will be blamed for the descent into the maelstrom and will be expeditiously swept away.

Just about anything may rise up across America after that — the true corn-pone Nazi who succeeds Trump in the meshuggeneh branch of conservative politics… a second civil war… or a World Made By Hand. I detect a general awareness that the country must pass through some epic ordeal to straighten itself out. Well, here it is, just in time or the holidays.

Me? I’m going to write-in my vote for Homey D. Clown, because he don’t mess around. 

philbravery:

bloody hell your posts are longer thN the election went for ....give it a rest

7 years 22 weeks ago
Report Abuse

icnif77:

When I feel article is good, I force it on yaa ....  Rest now!

On the side note: ''blogger's last name is Slovenian name, same as Trump's wifey, before she became 'wifey'."

This is from my extensive 'origin by name' research.

7 years 22 weeks ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
7 years 23 weeks ago
 
Know the answer ?
Please or register to post answer.

Report Abuse

Security Code: * Enter the text diplayed in the box below
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <u>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.

More information about formatting options

Forward Question

Answer of the DayMORE >>
A: 1. Find listing of Public schools in China through any of the main sea
A:1. Find listing of Public schools in China through any of the main search engines; Most or all Public schools in China have a web address ... 2. Send yer CV directly to the School's web address ... and WAIT! for a reply ... At FindJobs enter 'Public school' in search and ... scroll down the adverts and look for the advert where advertiser's and school's name are both the same ...All other job adverts are posted by the recruiters ... Good luck! -- icnif77