The place to ask China-related questions!
Beijing Shanghai Guangzhou Shenzhen Chengdu Xi'an Hangzhou Qingdao Dalian Suzhou Nanjing More Cities>>

Categories

Close
Welcome to eChinacities Answers! Please or register if you wish to join conversations or ask questions relating to life in China. For help, click here.

By continuing you agree to eChinacities's Privacy Policy .

Sign up with Google Sign up with Facebook
Sign up with Email Already have an account? .
0
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

Q: Any good Covid19 jokes ?

"I used to cough to cover my farts, now I fart to cover my coughs"

2 years 43 weeks ago in  Culture - China

 
Highest Voted
Posts: 718

General

4
5
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
1

Did you hear, Prince Charles caught Covid19 after eating an old bat.

icnif77:

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/coronavirus-prince-charles-out-of-selfisolation/news-story/933dd62436685f63be1d65ff0486b536

2 years 43 weeks ago
Report Abuse

LloydinYibin:

that's marrying an old bat

1 year 2 weeks ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
2 years 43 weeks ago
 
Answers (26 - 30 of 30)
Comments (69)
Posts: 890

Governor

2
2
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

nothing to see here.
it is all a coincidence.

https://openvaers.com/covid-data

Stiggs:

Disclaimer from their website:

 

VAERS CDC Disclaimer

Source: VAERS.HHS.GOV

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.” If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:

Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause.

Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.

The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.

VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.

VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.

VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public.

 

 

Snippet from one of the online sources fact checking this,whole article linked here:

 

"What the system makes perfectly clear: It does not establish a cause-and-effect relationship between any vaccine and those side effects. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention explicitly says the reports “may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.”

Among the reported side effects of the COVID vaccines in North Carolina: Yawning, fractures, a foot deformity, and wisdom tooth removal.

She estimates that 85 percent of the reports on VAERS are “either completely unrelated to vaccinations, or about events that pose little to no concern.”

 

http://www.cbs17.com/community/health/coronavirus/fact-checking-the-source-of-so-much-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation-the-vaers-database/

 

Other fact checks:

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-vaers-idUSKBN2AE0QQ

 

http://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/scicheck-viral-posts-misuse-vaers-data-to-make-false-claims-about-covid-19-vaccines/

 

 

 

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 year 1 week ago
 
Posts: 890

Governor

1
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

that right, don't listen to the experts who have everything to lose.

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Mike-Session-86-en:0

Stiggs:

If you google his name you'll see plenty of other eminent scientists - including the ones he worked with - disagreed with his opinions.

 

 

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 year 1 week ago
 
Posts: 890

Governor

1
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

icnif77:

Cofid vaxx wise ...

 

http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

 

Nuremberg Code (1947)

 

CIRP Introduction

The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.

This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.

This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.

This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.

The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extened into general codes of medical ethics.

 

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

 

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

 

Vera Sharav's quote from the stream:

 

" ... then they were Jews and today they are the unvaxxed ..."

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

Stiggs:

Are you really comparing yourself to Nazi era Jews?

 

You're not a victim here.

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

icnif77:

Think, Novak Djokovic, world no.1 tennis player ... 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHmyV7uFWRI

 

... and the entire World's Tennis Association ...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDHYlE5bjzA

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

Stiggs:

A tennis player wanting to enter a country and being kicked out because he tried to dodge the visa requirements is in no way comparable to a victim of genocide. He's not a victim either, just another idiot prone to histrionics.

 

 

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

icnif77:

While, if you read the whole saga with Djokovic Oz visa denial and deportation, he was exempt from Cofid vaxx. requirement 'cause he recuperated of Cofid just recently (Dec. 10th, 2021).

Then, denial-visa-law suit by Djokovic lawyers team ... and Court confirmed his exemption.

 

... and then the latest statement of Oz PM few days ago was:

"... main reason for Djokovic deportation was a negative impact his presence in Oz as a non-vaxxed would cause to the public opinion ..." ... something in those lines ...

Cofid vaxxed OZ statistic is " .. more than 94% of Ozzies are vaxxed ...", which is the highest percentage of vaxxed in the entire world. They are worse than Chinese ...

That would be some serious negative impact Djokovic would cause toward the less than 6% of non-vaxxed Ozzies ... LOL.

IMO, Ozzie-land is a no-go until Cofid completely cools down ...

 

Read Nuremberg's Health Code in 1947 ... copied above, i.e. I am exempt from vaxx ..., also, he he ... by my personal choice!

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

Stiggs:

No, he was told by tennis Australia and I think some other organisation he was exempt. Australian border control then told him that according to their rules he wasn't exempt, nobody enters without being vaccinated.

 

It would be like a recruiter telling you you can accept a job in China regardless of the current visa laws and border restrictions and you being denied entry at the border because you're not qualified to teach there and the borders are closed. Good luck telling them your recruiter gave you an exemption.

 

You could argue the rules are stupid and you don't agree with them, complain that's not fair and that what the recruiter told you should stand but even if that was true it would still be in no way comparable to genocide against the Jewish people.

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

icnif77:

We can just stay straight on Djokovic ...

1. He was denied an entry and stay by cops 'cause non-vaxxed ...; 2. Law suit against denial of stay and Court granted him a permit to stay ... and 3. Higher powers (Immigration minister Hawke) denied his permit-to-stay bid ...

Riot police had to fight with his Oz Serbian diaspora supporters yesterday ... LOLOL

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

Stiggs:

"We can just stay straight on Djokovic ..."

 

You're the one bringing up his case as being comparable to the Jews.

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

icnif77:

No metaphorize-ing needed, ( i.e. "We can just stay straight on Djokovic.") ... and comparison with nazis reflects toward the Oz .gov, not toward the Jews ...

Simplifying too much-o, ehh ...?

The patient rights (i.e. the guinea pig in this case) established by the Nuremberg Court are 100% valid at the latest pandemic vaxx. requirements ..

In the meantime, Israel is going for the 4th Cofid booster shot ...

Why in the world they would do that?

AAA-hem-mm ... guinea pigs.

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse
1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 year 1 week ago
 
Posts: 19683

Emperor

0
0
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

More ...

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/covid-lab-leak-whitewash-has-been-dea...

 

COVID Lab-Leak Whitewash Has Been 'The Death Of Science' Says Professor Who Found 'Unique Fingerprints'

 

University of London professor Angus Dalgleish, who co-authored a paper in summer 2020 after spotting "unique fingerprints" in Covid-19 samples that point to genetic manipulation, says that he's been the victim of a "disgusting whitewash," and that anyone suggesting a non-natural origin for Covid-19 has been silenced by peers.

"This goes back to the days of Copernicus and Galileo - it is the death of science," said the oncologist - who in 1984 discovered how HIV enters and kills cells.

 

Dalgleish's work was roundly rejected by a string of journalists before it was eventually published in a 'watered-down form,' according to the Express.

In February 2020, the Lancet had published a letter that “strongly condemned conspiracy theories” suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin. This highly influential letter – subsequently cited in thousands of scientific publications – was signed by 27 experts including Wellcome Trust head and former Sage member Sir Jeremy Farrar.

However, it has since emerged that two weeks before the letter was published, Sir Jeremy stated in private emails that some senior scientists believed a ‘likely explanation’ was that the virus was man-made. -Express

Indeed, Farrar led a February 1, 2020 teleconference (one day after Farrar emailed Anthony Fauci about a Zero Hedge article suggesting Covid may have come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology) - in which one virologist was "80 percent sure this thing had come out of a lab," with others sharing his view.

Dalgleish is the author of a book on Covid which claims the virus has "no credible natural ancestor." He says his team found amino acids within the Covid-19 spike protein with a positive charge - allowing the virus to cling to negative parts of the body.

But it was highly unusual to find so many positive charges in a row because they also repel each other, he said.

“We realised when they released the sequence of the virus it broke the laws of physics for a natural virus meaning it was genetically modified. 

“At the time my position was supported by Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6 who now chairs the University of London board of trustees.”

However, when they tried to publish their work they were turned down by numerous papers, including the Lancet. 

“My paper was rejected within five hours”, he said. “Normally it takes three weeks before it is even peer reviewed.” -Express

According to Dalgleish, "It was a political decision for this to be suppressed," adding that after the paper was released, "I was ostracised. I was fearful - really frightened at the way I was being treated."

"I was told I was not an expert on coronavirus’ and should just shut up. People tried to push us away. We were told our theory had no rationale and it was a conspiracy theory. I am so angry about this. I have more virus papers cited than most virology experts and they tried to push me aside. 

"They did not even look at the science. It was obvious it was a gain of function escape from a lab and I say escape, but that is generous. We had this data in late February after the sequences were released.

"This has been a whitewash. This whole thing has killed science. Science is meant to look at evidence. It is truly unbelievable."

According to Jacques van Helden, a bioinformatics professor at Aix-Marseille University in France, Peter Daszak's February 2020 Lancet letter effectively shut down debate over the origins of Covid-19.

"By labelling anyone with different views a conspiracy theorist, the Lancet letter was the worst form of bullying in full contravention of the scientific method," said van Helden," adding "To say that something has leaked from a lab does not make it a conspiracy theory."

"Why was that letter signed by so many people? Why can’t we discuss this issue in a scientific journal? I do not want to have to resort to an open exchange on Twitter."

 

First comment by HarryBallsac:

 

"They can’t even bring themselves to admit that this came from a lab when it’s the worst held secret in the world and they want me to trust them on a vaccine? No thanks." broken heart

 

Report Abuse
1 year 1 week ago
 
Posts: 890

Governor

1
1
You must be a registered user to vote!
You must be a registered user to vote!
0

icnif77:

I am successfully avoiding all 'move alongs' for now ...

Only airport tickets counter can convince me I have to get vaxxed ...

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse

Stiggs:

I kind of think you're probably trolling here - putting up links to the most tinfoil hat websites you can find as a way to get attention or website traffic but just in case you're not.....

 

When you see something alarming and hyperbolic on facebook, twitter or wherever, before you freak out google the claim, google who is making the claim, ask yourself if it makes any sense at all.

 

In the mean time, I wouldn't worry too much about this latest link you've found.

 

http://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vaccine-impact/

 

 

 

 

Vaccine Impact

Last updated on December 1st, 2021 at 11:29 am

Vaccine Impact - Conspiracy - Fake News - Alternative Health - Not CredibleVaccine Impact- Pseudoscience - Fake News - Alternative Health - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

 
  • Overall, we rate Vaccine Impact a Quackery level pseudoscience website for the promotion of anti-vaccination propaganda.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Vaccine Impact is a news and information website that promotes pseudoscience, such as anti-vaccination propaganda. According to their about page, Vaccine Impact is a part of the Health Impact News network. It is a sub-topic in their “Medicine Watch” category. Health Impact News is an alternative medicine, holistic, and nutrition website. Sophia Media publishes them, and Brian Shilhavy is the Managing Editor. According to their about page, they “cover stories that impact your health, but that the mainstream media seldom covers.”

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Vaccine Impact is owned by Health Impact News who does not specify ownership; however, Sophia Media is listed as the publisher. Revenue is derived from online advertising.

 

Analysis / Bias

In review, Vaccine Impact publishes health-related news stories that they state are alternative. Our analysis concurs that they are certainly an alternative to conventional science and medicine. They are fiercely anti-vaccine with articles such as this: Vaccine Awareness Week: Fighting the Vaccine Culture War and Opposing Mandatory Vaccines. They also promote misinformation regarding Covid-19, such as this California ER Physicians: Sheltering in Place Does More Harm than Good – Lowers Our Immune System. In general, this is an anti-vaccination website that the discredited Health Impact News owns.

Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, Vaccine Impact published false and misleading claims.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Vaccine Impact a Quackery-level pseudoscience website for the promotion of anti-vaccination propaganda. (D. Van Zandt 5/02/2020) Updated (12/01/2021)

Source: https://vaccineimpact.com/

 

 

 

 

1 year 1 week ago
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 year 1 week ago
 
Know the answer ?
Please or register to post answer.

Report Abuse

Security Code: * Enter the text diplayed in the box below
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <u>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.

More information about formatting options

Forward Question

Answer of the DayMORE >>
A: https://www.travelchinaguide.com/embassy/visa/permanent-residence-perm
A:https://www.travelchinaguide.com/embassy/visa/permanent-residence-permit.htm https://www.travelchinaguide.com/embassy/visa/10-years.htm LT Chinese visa for Chinese descent foreigners:https://www.bal.com/bal-news/new-5-year-visa-and-residence-permits-now-available-for-foreigners-of-chinese-descent/ https://www.travelchinaguide.com/embassy/visa/information.htm https://www.hrone.com/blog/residence-permit-foreigners-china/ https://www.ivisa.com/china-blog/10-year-china-visa-for-a-us-citizen You could also ask for the detailed explanation of LT visas at your Embassy in China. -- icnif77